INTEL KARTEL // POLICE INFO VAGY… PENZ? INTELKARTEL SERVICES / JOBS / BOOK / POLKOREKT /

KONTACT // DISCLAIMER // BOOKS // MORE INTEL // INTELKARTEL BOOK // HANDBOOK // BELTA PROGRAM

– AZ UTOLSO KOMMUNISTA

ANGOL FORDITAS:

TECHNO PARTY NEXT TO A DISINTEGRATING SOVIET UNION (4)Letölt
TE UTOLSO KOMMUNISTALetölt
DOCTRINE OF THE ECO BOLSEVIK _ VDLetölt

VEGLEGES GYOZLEM = TOTAL FKN SZABADSAG!

SZABADSAGOT A NEPNEK! 3 FONTOS ALAP PONT!

  1. CSUTORTOK PENZ (10 000 HUF MINDEN CSUTORTOK MINDEN POLGARNAK)

2. LAKHATAS MINDEN INDIVIDUMNAK (INFLUENZA KARANTEN MINIMUM)

3. KENDER LEGALIZACIO ES SZER HASZNALAT DEKRIMINALIZACIO

MEG KERESZTENYELNEK E MINKET A HATRA NYLAS HOROG KERESZTENYEK? AVAGY MIERT BARATUNK AZ ATESITA. ES TUDOOOOS. ES A MUNKAS. OLVASS, OLVASS ES OLVASS.

LAST COMMUNISMS ON THE PLANET:

MILITARY INTELLIGENCE MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Comparative Statistics on Global Communist Populations and Party Membership (1949–2023)

DATE: January 19, 2025

I. POPULATION LIVING UNDER COMMUNIST RULE

  • 1949: ~540 million people (primarily USSR, China, and Eastern Bloc nations).
  • Peak (Late 20th Century): ~1.5 billion people.
  • 2023: ~1.4 billion people (China, Vietnam, Laos, Cuba, North Korea).

II. COMMUNIST PARTY MEMBERSHIP

  • 1949 (CPC – China): ~4.5 million members.
  • 2023 (CPC – China): ~99.19 million members (7.04% of China’s population).
  • Other Parties (2023):
    • Vietnam: ~5.2 million members (~5.4% of population).
    • Cuba: ~800,000 members (~7% of population).
    • North Korea: ~6 million members (~25% of population, including associated youth leagues).

III. HISTORICAL TREND SUMMARY

  • Peak Communist Membership (USSR, China, Eastern Bloc): Estimated 200+ million party members globally (1970s–1980s).
  • Post-Soviet Decline: Membership reduced significantly in Eastern Europe and former USSR states.
  • Current Total Membership (2023): Estimated ~112 million globally, with CPC comprising ~88.5%.

IV. OBSERVATIONS

  • Population Trends: Decline in global population under communism attributed to regime transitions in Europe and Central Asia.
  • Party Membership Trends: Growth in CPC membership contrasts with global declines elsewhere.

END OF MEMORANDUM

Major Eurasian State Actors and Socialism/Communism

  1. China (People’s Republic of China)
    • Political System: Single-party communist state led by the Communist Party of China (CPC).
    • Global Stance: Actively promotes socialism with Chinese characteristics. Supports socialist-aligned countries economically and politically (e.g., Cuba, Venezuela, North Korea).
    • Key Alliances:
      • Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) expands influence across Eurasia, Africa, and Latin America.
      • Support for BRICS countries to promote a multipolar world order.
    • Contact: Ministry of Foreign Affairs (https://www.fmprc.gov.cn).
  2. Russia (Russian Federation)
    • Political System: Federal semi-presidential republic. No longer socialist, but retains strong ties with former Soviet-aligned states.
    • Global Stance: Supports socialist-leaning regimes strategically (e.g., Venezuela, Cuba) and opposes Western hegemony.
    • Key Alliances:
      • Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO).
      • SCO (Shanghai Cooperation Organization) alongside China.
    • Contact: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation (https://mid.ru).
  3. Vietnam
    • Political System: Single-party communist state led by the Communist Party of Vietnam.
    • Global Stance: Focuses on economic reforms while maintaining ideological ties to socialism. Supports other socialist states through ASEAN.
    • Contact: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Vietnam (https://www.mofa.gov.vn).
  4. North Korea (DPRK)
    • Political System: Single-party communist state led by the Workers’ Party of Korea.
    • Global Stance: Maintains ideological alignment with communism and socialism. Supported by China and Russia in global forums.
    • Contact: Ministry of Foreign Affairs, North Korea (details not publicly available online).

European Socialist/Communist Supporters

  1. Belarus
    • Political System: Presidential republic with strong state control over the economy.
    • Global Stance: Aligns with Russia; supports anti-Western socialist rhetoric.
    • Contact: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Belarus (https://mfa.gov.by).
  2. Cuba (Indirect Eurasian Connection)
    • While not in Eurasia, Cuba receives significant support from Eurasian powers like China and Russia.
  3. European Far-Left Movements
    • Political parties like Syriza (Greece), Die Linke (Germany), and Podemos (Spain) promote socialism within democratic frameworks.
    • Global Stance: Advocacy often focuses on anti-austerity measures and climate justice.

Organizations and Forums Supporting Socialism/Communism

  1. Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO)
    • Members include China, Russia, India, and Central Asian states.
    • Focuses on economic cooperation and countering Western influence.
    • Website: http://eng.sectsco.org.
  2. BRICS
    • Economic bloc of Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa.
    • Promotes multipolar global governance, indirectly supporting socialist ideals.
    • Website: https://infobrics.org.

Here’s a detailed list of contact links for key ministries and embassies of the countries in Eurasia associated with supporting socialism or communism globally:

China (People’s Republic of China)

Russia (Russian Federation)

Vietnam

North Korea (DPRK)

  • Ministry of Foreign Affairs: Official details are not publicly listed online.
  • Embassy Locator: DPRK maintains embassies in several countries. Specific contact info can be found through respective host country directories or via allied embassies.

Belarus

Cuba (Indirect Eurasian Connection)

Organizations and Forums

  1. Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO)
  2. BRICS

Here are the official links to locate Russian and Belarusian embassies worldwide and their contact details:

Russia (Russian Federation)

  1. Ministry of Foreign Affairs
  2. Embassy Locator Tool:

Belarus

  1. Ministry of Foreign Affairs
  2. Direct Embassy Search:

Here’s an overview of prominent communist parties globally, categorized by region. These parties range from ruling entities in single-party states to opposition parties and grassroots movements in multiparty systems.

Asia

  1. China
    • Communist Party of China (CPC): Ruling party since 1949. Largest communist party in the world.
  2. Vietnam
    • Communist Party of Vietnam (CPV): Ruling party since 1976.
  3. North Korea
    • Workers’ Party of Korea (WPK): Ruling party since 1948.
      • Website: Not publicly accessible.
  4. Laos
    • Lao People’s Revolutionary Party (LPRP): Ruling party since 1975.
  5. India
    • Communist Party of India (CPI): Active political party with historical significance.
    • Communist Party of India (Marxist) (CPI-M): Major left-wing party in Indian politics.
  6. Nepal
    • Communist Party of Nepal (Unified Socialist): Active in coalition governments.
    • Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist Centre): Influential in shaping Nepal’s political transition.
  7. Japan
    • Japanese Communist Party (JCP): Largest non-ruling communist party globally.

Europe

  1. Russia
    • Communist Party of the Russian Federation (CPRF): Largest opposition party, successor to the CPSU.
  2. Belarus
    • Communist Party of Belarus (CPB): Supports the government of Alexander Lukashenko.
  3. Greece
    • Communist Party of Greece (KKE): Prominent left-wing political force.
  4. France
    • French Communist Party (PCF): Active in European and national politics.
  5. Portugal
    • Portuguese Communist Party (PCP): Influential in trade union movements.
  6. Italy
    • Party of Communist Refoundation (PRC): Active in leftist coalitions.
  7. Spain
    • Communist Party of Spain (PCE): Part of the United Left coalition.
  8. Germany
    • German Communist Party (DKP): Smaller, non-parliamentary party.

Latin America

  1. Cuba
    • Communist Party of Cuba (PCC): Sole governing party since 1965.
  2. Venezuela
  3. Brazil
    • Communist Party of Brazil (PCdoB): Active in electoral coalitions.
  4. Chile
    • Communist Party of Chile (PCCh): Member of progressive coalitions.
  5. Argentina
    • Communist Party of Argentina (PCA): Advocates socialism within democratic structures.

Africa

  1. South Africa
    • South African Communist Party (SACP): Close ally of the African National Congress (ANC).
  2. Angola
    • MPLA (People’s Movement for the Liberation of Angola): Governing party with Marxist roots.
      • Website: Not publicly available.
  3. Mozambique
    • FRELIMO (Mozambique Liberation Front): Governing party with historical Marxist-Leninist orientation.

North America

  1. United States
    • Communist Party USA (CPUSA): Advocates socialism in the U.S. democratic system.
  2. Canada
    • Communist Party of Canada (CPC): Focuses on workers’ rights and socialism.

Oceania

  1. Australia
    • Communist Party of Australia (CPA): Active in trade union movements.
  2. New Zealand
    • Communist Party of Aotearoa: Smaller, activist-based group.

Hungary has a complex history with communism, especially during the 20th century. Here’s an overview of its communist past and the current status of left-wing or communist parties in the country:

Historical Context

  1. Hungarian Soviet Republic (1919):
    • A short-lived communist regime led by Béla Kun, established after World War I. It was overthrown within months.
  2. Communist Era (1949–1989):
    • The Hungarian People’s Republic was established under Soviet influence.
    • The ruling party was the Hungarian Socialist Workers’ Party (MSZMP), operating under a Marxist-Leninist framework.
    • Notable Event: The 1956 Hungarian Revolution, a major anti-Soviet uprising, was crushed by Soviet forces.
  3. Post-1989:
    • Communism collapsed after Hungary transitioned to a multiparty democratic system during the fall of the Eastern Bloc.

Contemporary Communist and Leftist Parties in Hungary

  1. Hungarian Workers’ Party (Magyar Munkáspárt)
    • Founded in 1989 as the successor to the Hungarian Socialist Workers’ Party (MSZMP).
    • Ideology: Marxist-Leninist. Advocates for socialism and workers’ rights.
    • Influence: Limited to minor electoral success, with minimal representation.
    • Website: www.munkaspart.hu
  2. Workers’ Party of Hungary 2006 (Munkáspárt 2006)
    • A splinter group of the Hungarian Workers’ Party, focusing on socialist ideals.
    • Influence: Marginal political impact.
  3. Socialist Party (Magyar Szocialista Párt – MSZP)
    • Although not communist, the MSZP is the successor of the Hungarian Socialist Workers’ Party.
    • Ideology: Social democracy, center-left.
    • Role: Active in Hungarian politics, often forming coalitions with other liberal and progressive parties.
    • Website: www.mszp.hu

Current Political Climate

  • Hungary is governed by the Fidesz party, a right-wing nationalist party led by Viktor Orbán.
  • Left-wing and communist parties face significant challenges in gaining traction due to the dominance of conservative forces and the country’s historical disillusionment with Soviet-style communism.

Over the past century, various right-wing death squads have emerged globally, often operating as paramilitary groups targeting perceived left-wing opponents, activists, and civilians. Notable instances include:

Latin America:

  • El Salvador (1980s): During the Salvadoran Civil War, far-right death squads, such as those led by Roberto D’Aubuisson, targeted Marxist–Leninist guerrilla forces and their civilian supporters. These groups were responsible for numerous human rights abuses, including the assassination of Archbishop Óscar Romero in 1980. citeturn0news16
  • Guatemala (1960s-1990s): In the Guatemalan Civil War, military-led death squads, including the Mano Blanca (“White Hand”), targeted leftist insurgents and civilians. Under leaders like Colonel Carlos Arana Osorio, these squads were implicated in widespread atrocities. citeturn0search11
  • Argentina (1976-1983): During the “Dirty War,” the military dictatorship employed death squads to eliminate suspected left-wing dissidents. Thousands were forcibly disappeared or killed in state-sponsored terrorism. citeturn0search3

Europe:

  • Romania (1930s): The Iron Guard, a fascist organization, formed death squads like the Nicadori and Decemviri, responsible for political assassinations, including that of Prime Minister Ion G. Duca in 1933. citeturn0search10

Contemporary Usage:

In recent years, the term “Right Wing Death Squad” (RWDS) has been adopted by far-right extremists in the United States. The slogan appears in memes, online forums, and on apparel, often associated with groups like the Proud Boys. Notably, the shooter in the 2023 Allen, Texas mall incident wore an “RWDS” patch, highlighting the term’s continued relevance in extremist circles. citeturn0search5

These instances underscore the persistent presence of right-wing death squads in various forms over the past century, reflecting a pattern of politically motivated violence against perceived ideological adversaries.

TE UTOLSO FASISZTA.

TE UTOLSÓ FASISHTAH059Letölt

The Torah’s prohibition against murder is deeply rooted in its theological, moral, and legal framework. Below is an extensive exploration of the reasons behind this prohibition, the consequences of murder in ancient times, and the concept of revenge:

Reasons Why the Torah Bans Murder

  1. Sanctity of Human Life:
    • Humans are created in the image of God (Imago Dei, Genesis 1:27). Taking a human life is seen as an affront to God Himself.
    • Life is a divine gift, and only God has the authority to determine its end.
  2. Moral and Ethical Foundation:
    • Murder violates the moral order established by the Torah. It disrupts communal harmony and undermines trust among individuals.
  3. Legal and Social Order:
    • Ancient societies, including those guided by Torah laws, required strict regulations to maintain stability. Murder was considered an act of chaos that threatened the foundation of society.
  4. Violation of the Commandments:
    • The Sixth Commandment explicitly states: “You shall not murder” (Lo Tirtzach). This commandment underscores the Torah’s emphasis on the inviolability of life.
  5. Justice and Accountability:
    • Murder denies individuals their right to justice and disrupts the communal sense of fairness.
  6. Prohibition of Vengeance and Vigilantism:
    • The Torah discourages personal revenge, instead establishing a system of legal redress to handle such crimes.

Consequences of Murder in the Past

  1. Capital Punishment:
    • Murderers were often subject to the death penalty. For instance, Numbers 35:31 states that no ransom is accepted for the life of a murderer; they must be put to death.
  2. City of Refuge (Arei Miklat):
    • If the murder was unintentional, the perpetrator could flee to a city of refuge to avoid revenge by the victim’s family. This ensured a fair trial and protected against wrongful killings (Numbers 35:11-28).
  3. Restitution and Atonement:
    • In cases of manslaughter, the offender might be required to live in exile within the city of refuge until the death of the High Priest, symbolizing the completion of atonement.
  4. Divine Justice:
    • The Torah also highlights that ultimate justice lies with God. If human systems failed to punish a murderer, divine retribution was believed to follow.
  5. Bloodguilt:
    • The land itself was considered defiled by murder, requiring justice to cleanse the community (Numbers 35:33-34).

Revenge and Its Regulation

  1. Blood Avenger (Go’el HaDam):
    • In cases of murder, the nearest kin of the victim (called the Go’el HaDam) had the right to avenge the death. However, this right was strictly regulated to prevent an endless cycle of revenge (Numbers 35:19).
  2. Distinction Between Murder and Manslaughter:
    • Premeditated murder warranted the death penalty, whereas unintentional killing allowed for refuge, preventing revenge killings while maintaining justice.
  3. Rejection of Collective Punishment:
    • The Torah emphasizes individual accountability. For example, Ezekiel 18:20 states: “The soul who sins shall die.” This principle discourages acts of revenge against the family or community of the offender.
  4. Limitations on Retaliation:
    • While the concept of Lex Talionis (“an eye for an eye”) exists, it is interpreted by Jewish tradition as advocating proportionality and legal oversight rather than literal retaliation.

Philosophical and Spiritual Implications

  1. Human Relationships:
    • Murder is a violation of the relational bonds God intended for humanity, as it destroys trust and unity.
  2. Cycle of Violence:
    • The Torah seeks to end cycles of violence by advocating structured legal systems rather than personal vengeance.
  3. Respect for Divine Authority:
    • Prohibiting murder emphasizes the belief that humans are not autonomous beings but accountable to God’s moral law.
  4. Teaching Responsibility:
    • By holding individuals accountable for taking life, the Torah teaches the gravity of moral responsibility in human actions.

In summary, the Torah bans murder to preserve the sanctity of life, maintain justice, and ensure communal stability. Its legal and moral frameworks aim to prevent the chaos of unregulated vengeance and provide a path toward justice and atonement, balancing human accountability with divine authority.

POLICE INFORMATION

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+