INTEL 190

LARGE REGIONAL WAR IN THE MIDDLE EAST MIGHT START IN 48 HOURS? UKRAINE JOINS NATO? PEOPLE SHOULD GO ROUGE IF NEEDS BE: Boris Johnson akkori brit miniszterelnök „megtiltotta” nekik a megállapodás aláírását.  UKRAINE AND RUSSIA, END THE FUCKING WAR, PARTITION UKRAINE NOW. BROTHERS MURDERNING EACH OTHER MÁR A BIBLIÁBAN IS…

LARGE REGIONAL WAR IN THE MIDDLE EAST MIGHT START IN 48 HOURS?

UKRAINE JOINS NATO?

PEOPLE SHOULD GO ROUGE IF NEEDS BE: Boris Johnson akkori brit miniszterelnök „megtiltotta” nekik a megállapodás aláírását. 

UKRAINE AND RUSSIA, END THE FUCKING WAR,

PARTITION UKRAINE NOW.

BROTHERS MURDERNING EACH OTHER MÁR A BIBLIÁBAN IS GÁZ VOLT.

2022[edit]

On 28 February 2022, four days after the launch of the Russian invasion, President Putin ordered Russia’s nuclear forces to go into a “special mode of combat duty”, a state of high alert.[2][3]

On 20 April 2022, Russia carried out its first test launch of the RS-28 Sarmat, a new long-range intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM). Putin said the new missile could defeat any missile defences, and that it should cause countries threatening Russia to “think twice”.[4] The United States Department of Defense confirmed that Russia had properly notified the U.S. about the launch in advance, pursuant to New START, and that the U.S. considered the launch to be a routine test and not a threat.[5]

On 24 April, in apparent response to US secretary of state Antony Blinken‘s meeting with Zelenskyy in Kyiv on 23 April, Russian foreign minister Sergey Lavrov stated that further support of Ukraine could cause tensions which could potentially lead to a World War III scenario involving Russia’s full arsenal of weapons.[6] The day after Lavrov’s comments, CNBC reported that US secretary Lloyd Austin referred to Russia’s nuclear war rhetoric as being “dangerous and unhelpful”.[7]

In apparent response to Germany deploying armed tanks to Ukraine, Putin announced in Russia’s main legislative assembly that Russia would respond to any combative military provocation from outside of Ukraine with prompt peremptory action possible only with Russia’s unique arsenal of nuclear weapons.[8] Pentagon Press secretary John Kirby called Putin’s assertion of nuclear potency contrary to the process of the peaceful resolution of the current conflict in Ukraine.[9]

On 29 May, after repudiating accusations made against Russia regarding atrocities in Bucha, the Russian ambassador to the UK, Andrei Kelin, said in an interview with the BBC that he did not believe Russia would use tactical nuclear weapons in Ukraine until Russian sovereignty was found to be in peril.[3]

On 21 September, while announcing a partial mobilization of conscripts, Putin said that Russia “will use all the means at our disposal” – widely interpreted as a threat to use nuclear weapons – in order to defend the country’s territory.[10] He warned that his threat was “not a bluff”, baselessly accused NATO of “nuclear blackmail” and of threatening to use nuclear weapons against Russia, and said Russia’s nuclear weapons were more advanced than NATO’s.[11][12] Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov did not rule out the use of nuclear weapons to defend annexed Ukrainian territories.[13] Several days later, former Russian president and Putin ally Dmitry Medvedev made a more explicit threat of a nuclear strike against Ukraine.[14]

On 1 October, Ramzan Kadyrov, head of the Chechen Republic, called on Russia to use low-yield nuclear weapons in Ukraine in response to Russia losing the strategically important Ukrainian town of Lyman,[15] the first prominent Russian official to directly call for the use of nuclear weapons.[16] In response to Kadyrov’s comments, Kremlin press secretary Dmitry Peskov said that the use of nuclear weapons would be determined by Russian military doctrine and not by emotions.[17]

Later in October, Russian officials, including Russian defense minister Sergei Shoigu,[18] began accusing Ukraine of preparing to use a radioactive dirty bomb on Ukrainian territory, prompting concerns in the West that Russia itself might be planning to use a dirty bomb and blame it on Ukraine. The allegations were additionally communicated in phone calls to Western officials by two top Russian officials.[19] On 24 October, John Kirby stated that there was no evidence Russia was preparing a dirty bomb strike.[20] A tweet by the Russian Ministry of Defence, purportedly showing evidence of a Ukrainian dirty bomb in production, was debunked as a collection of old and unrelated photos.[21] At Ukraine’s request, the United Nations sent an IAEA investigation to Ukraine, which found no evidence of a dirty bomb being developed or any other undeclared nuclear activity.[22][23][24]

2023[edit]

On 22 January 2023, Vyacheslav Volodin, the speaker of the Duma, wrote on Telegram that “If Washington and NATO countries supply weapons that will be used to strike civilian cities and attempt to seize our territories, as they threaten, this will lead to retaliatory measures using more powerful weapons,” and “Arguments that the nuclear powers have not previously used weapons of mass destruction in local conflicts are untenable. Because these states did not face a situation where there was a threat to the security of their citizens and the territorial integrity of the country.”[25] In the same month, Russia repeatedly accused Ukraine of storing its military equipment in the nuclear power plants under its control. The IAEA has permanent observers in all Ukrainian plants since 2022, and on 24 January 2023, the agency issued a statement that it had found no military equipment in the plants.[26]

On 21 February 2023, during a Presidential Address to the Federal Assembly, Putin announced that Russia would be suspending its participation in New START, the last remaining nuclear weapons treaty between Russia and the United States. He stated, “[Russia] is not withdrawing from the treaty but is suspending its participation.”[27][28] On 26 February 2023, to state-owned television channel Russia-1, Putin said that Russia had no choice but to “take into account” the nuclear capabilities of NATO, and that the West wanted to “liquidate” Russia.[29] Russia said it would continue informing the US on planned launches of intercontinental and submarine-launched ballistic missiles under the 1988 Ballistic Missile Launch Notification Agreement.[30]

On 25 March 2023, Putin announced plans to install Russian tactical nuclear weapons in Belarus.[31] On 29 March, Russia’s Defense Ministry announced that it would conduct a nuclear missile drill, which includes the testing of nuclear-tipped RS-24 Yars missiles.[32]

In March 2023, Russian journalist Dmitry Muratov, who won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2021, warned that Russian state propaganda “is preparing people to think that nuclear war is not a bad thing. On TV channels here, nuclear war and nuclear weapons are promoted as if they’re advertising pet food.”[33]

In June 2023, Russian political scientist Sergey Karaganov called for the use of nuclear weapons by Russia against NATO member states in Europe, saying that “we will have to hit a bunch of targets in a number of countries in order to bring those who have lost their mind to reason.”[34]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_risk_during_the_Russian_invasion_of_Ukraine

INTELKARTEL.COM

V300

Hozzászólás