INTEL 263 28 22

CLASSIFIED // MILINT EYES ONLYMEMORANDUM From: Directorate of Military IntelligenceTo: Commanding Authority, Security Operations DivisionSubject: Assessment of “Crininlogosist Hobby” Concept 1. Executive Summary A concept referred to as the “Crininlogosist Hobby” has surfaced, outlining a social-engineering model based on orchestrated criminal acts and subsequent societal division. The underlying premise is…


CLASSIFIED // MILINT EYES ONLY
MEMORANDUM

From: Directorate of Military Intelligence
To: Commanding Authority, Security Operations Division
Subject: Assessment of “Crininlogosist Hobby” Concept


1. Executive Summary

A concept referred to as the “Crininlogosist Hobby” has surfaced, outlining a social-engineering model based on orchestrated criminal acts and subsequent societal division. The underlying premise is to force populations into two opposing categories: (a) silent bystanders who fail to report crimes, and (b) vocal reporters (“snitches”) who channel information into law enforcement systems. Both groups are subsequently categorized as compromised—either through criminal complicity (silence) or through alignment with “police bureaucracy” (reporting).

This construct reframes criminology as a form of subversive control, essentially branding the “criminologist” as an orchestrator of social division, akin to a gangster operating under the guise of analysis.


2. Details of Concept

  • Step 1: Initiate a controlled crime event.
  • Step 2: Observe societal response.
    • Group A: Non-reporters (“silent criminals”).
    • Group B: Reporters (“snitches/police collaborators”).
  • Step 3: Both groups are discredited or targeted:
    • Group A is implicated as complicit.
    • Group B is marked as collaborators subject to distrust.
  • Outcome: A systematic method to delegitimize both passive civilians and active informants, framing both as criminally aligned.

3. Intelligence Assessment

  • Ideological Nature: The idea blends criminology with gangland philosophy, reframing crime not as an object of prevention but as a tool of social sorting.
  • Potential Risk:
    • Could inspire radical elements to operationalize crimes as tests of loyalty.
    • May degrade trust in community reporting systems, weakening police/civil cooperation.
    • If applied at scale, could destabilize civil order by painting both silence and compliance as forms of criminality.
  • Psychological Effect: Creates an environment where neutrality is impossible; all participants are criminalized.

4. Recommendation

  • Monitor for emergence of individuals or groups promoting this framework.
  • Conduct HUMINT/OSINT sweeps in radical forums for references to “Crininlogosist” terminology.
  • Prepare counter-narratives emphasizing civic responsibility and exposing manipulative intent behind such models.

End of Memorandum
CLASSIFIED // DO NOT DISTRIBUTE


INTELKARTEL.COM

V300

Hozzászólás