---

A Radical Incentive: Could Deportation Spur a Safer, More Disciplined Europe?

Europe faces an escalating crisis. Youth crime is surging in many urban centers, educational engagement is faltering, and social cohesion is increasingly frayed. Traditional approaches—better schools, community outreach, social work—have made limited dents in the problem. As Europe pivots toward an era of geopolitical instability, some argue that bold, even uncomfortable, solutions are required to secure internal harmony and focus on the growing external threats.

One such controversial proposal suggests that Europe and the United Kingdom might consider deporting persistently disruptive young people, ages 12 to 28, to a designated rehabilitation zone—such as Libya—under a hypothetical international agreement. The theory posits that by creating clear, visible consequences for sustained anti-social behavior, a new cultural discipline could emerge, reducing crime, incentivizing academic achievement, and sharply diminishing social resentment and racism.

Incentives That Resonate

At the heart of this theory is a classic economic principle: incentives matter. If students and young people know that chronic misbehavior could lead to deportation and intensive rehabilitation abroad, the calculus changes. Crime is often a rational response to perceived impunity or lack of opportunity. By raising the stakes, policymakers could instill stronger social deterrents against disruptive behavior, much like harsh penalties reduce certain types of corporate misconduct.

The ripple effect could extend to schools, where the looming prospect of exile would serve as a powerful motivator to focus on academics, discipline, and civic responsibility. Parents, too, would likely engage more seriously in their children’s development to avoid the unthinkable.

A Space for Rehabilitation

The proposal does not necessarily envision deportation as abandonment. Rather, it could establish rehabilitation cities or zones—perhaps supported by European funding—in Libya or elsewhere, where deported individuals would receive vocational training, education, and the chance to reintegrate into society on new terms.

Such zones could operate as international development projects, creating employment, security partnerships, and social infrastructure in regions often neglected by global capital. Libya, with the right governance and investment, might benefit economically from the influx of resources and international attention.

The Promise of Social Harmony

Perhaps most controversially, some supporters of this theory argue that forcibly removing persistently disruptive individuals would, over time, reduce the simmering tensions that feed racism and xenophobia. By excising the most visible sources of public disorder, it is theorized that trust between communities could rebuild, and populist scapegoating would lose its traction. Social cohesion could improve when law-abiding citizens of all backgrounds no longer feel they are hostages to a minority of bad actors.

Furthermore, the political energy now consumed by internal social crises could be redirected toward supporting Europe’s allies, strengthening borders, and addressing pressing security threats.

Acknowledging the Ethical Dilemma

This vision, while radical, is not without precedent. Societies have long used exile, isolation, and forced relocation as tools to maintain order. Yet the modern world rightly recoils at such measures, particularly where they risk violating human rights or replicating colonial patterns of exploitation.

A successful version of this policy would require rigorous safeguards, independent oversight, and international partnerships to ensure fairness and prevent systemic abuses. Critics will argue that the risks of injustice, discrimination, and unintended consequences are too high. Proponents counter that the status quo is already failing millions, and new thinking is desperately needed.

A Provocation Worth Debating

To be sure, this is not a proposal likely to appear on mainstream ballots anytime soon. But as Europe confronts rising crime, social fragmentation, and the need for greater geopolitical focus, even its most uncomfortable policy frontiers may warrant open discussion.

Perhaps radical incentives—though imperfect—could jolt the continent toward a safer, more disciplined future.

---