By

Published on

INTEL 310

Since at least the early 1960s, many have understood that the post-war intelligence agencies have posed an especially dangerous threat to the people of the United States. For example, exactly one month after Kennedy’s assassination—surely, just a coincidence!—former president Harry Truman expressed alarm about the CIA’s meddling in domestic affairs. He wrote in The Washington Post: “For some time I have been disturbed by the way CIA has been diverted from its original assignment. It has become an operational and at times a policy-making arm of the Government. This has led to trouble and may have compounded our difficulties in several explosive areas. …I never had any thought that when I set up the CIA that it would be injected into peacetime cloak and dagger operations.”

Then as now, however, The Washington Post was an arm of the deep state and the editor buried Truman’s op-ed on Page A11. The CIA was outraged enough by the column, however, that CIA director Allen Dulles lied and claimed that Truman had been “quite astounded“ when he saw his own article and that the whole thing was really the work of a Truman aide.

This bizarre attempt by CIA operative to “retract” Truman’s article was nonetheless contradicted by Truman himself who reiterated in a 1964 letter that Truman had only intended the CIA to be an informational service for the president, and that “[I]t was not intended to operate as an international agency engaged in strange activities.” Truman would later tell an interviewer that “[I]f I’d known what was going to happen, I never would have [created the CIA.]”1 

Of course, Truman may have known about many of the CIA’s “strange activities” by the late 1950s, such as MKULTRA, and related “mind control” experiments with LSD and other drugs. The CIA was known to drug the agency’s victims against their will, such as seven black inmates in Kentucky who were were fed “’double, triple and quadruple’ doses of LSD for 77 straight days.” One might also mention the very suspicious case of Frank Olson, a bioweapons expert who was given LSD by CIA agents without his knowledge. Olson later “fell” to his death from a hotel window in 1953. The agency lied about drugging Olson for 22 years. 

The CIA faced some scrutiny in the wake of the Vietnam war as the Left began to rein in the deep state which had spent years attempting to destroy American opponents of the war through a variety of dirty tricks. Yet, the agency had hardly been “reformed” by the time the US’s “war on terror” was launched in late 2001. The CIA returned to its illegal medical torture—assuming it had ever stopped—with new medical experiments on regime prisoners. Documents uncovered by the ACLU have shown that CIA doctors are still used to provide a veneer of scientific legitimacy to CIA torture programs. In the age of vaccine passports, this alliance between doctors and the CIA should alarm any defender of human rights. 

In spite of all this, the CIA continues to fail spectacularly at its original mission of collecting useful information. The CIA failed to see the Iranian Revolution coming. The CIA was clueless about Soviet Missiles shipped to Cuba in 1962. The CIA believed the Soviet Union was an economic powerhouse in the 1980s. And, of course, the CIA let 9/11 happen right under its nose

Given all this, even conservative stalwarts have seen the light on the CIA in recent years. The late Angelo Codevilla, for example, penned a 2020 article calling for “breaking up” the CIA. The CIA, Codevilla notes, is now so “ideologically partisan,” so “obsolete,” and its record of failure so undeniable, that the agency is now “inherently dangerous and low-value.” 

End the FBI

The CIA isn’t alone in its war on American freedom and decency, however. The FBI is almost equally dangerous, which is why Codevilla also calls for the FBI to be “restricted to law enforcement.” 

Unknown to many Americans, the FBI doesn’t even consider itself to be a law enforcement agency anymore. The FBI is now a “national security” agency, and that means the FBI is an arm of the American spy regime. This, of course, is why the Department of Justice can now be used for blatantly political purposes such as when the FBI spied on candidate Donald Trump in 2016

Here at mises.org, we’ve already reported on the mixture of abuse and incompetence that characterizes the FBI. The FBI expends countless hours tracking down harmless “enemies” of the regime—such as little old ladies prosecuted for the January 6 riot—while ignoring real criminals like Larry Nassar. Nor surprisingly, local police will tell you it’s the state and local police who do the real work of tracking down real criminals, and then the FBI swoops in to take the credit. 

Moreover, the history of the FBI lends substantial plausibility to Tucker Carlson’s claim that intelligence agencies are in the business of blackmailing members of Congress. This is a known tactic employed by J. Edgar Hoover during this 48-year reign at the FBI. Hoover, of course, was lauded for decades as a hero, but in reality, he was, in the words of historian Beverly Gage, a “one-dimensional tyrant and backroom schemer who strong-armed the rest of the country into submission…the most influential federal appointee of the twentieth century.” Hoover and his army of compliant FBI agents spied on anyone and everyone—especially elected officials and other public figures—who might be useful as a target for blackmail.

INTEL 399-72 92-22

TOP SECRET // SCIENCE FICTION // EYES ONLY Directorate for Strategic Counterintelligence Technical Assessment Memorandum Reference: DSCI/TS-41-ΔSubject: Hypothetical Compromise of Artificial Life Induced War Simulation Infrastructure (A.L.I.F.E.) Executive Summary This memorandum presents a theoretical assessment of a catastrophic security breach involving the unauthorized acquisition of classified military simulation technology by a decentralized criminal organization. The…

INTEL 303 03 3-2 VD

CLASSIFIED // EYES ONLY // SATIRICAL SCIENCE FICTION Directorate Memorandum 7A-113 Subject: Unauthorized Acquisition of Military Reality-Simulation Technology by Institutional Syndicates Distribution: Restricted to personnel with clearance level OBSIDIAN or above. Executive Summary Recent intelligence suggests the emergence of a highly organized network originating from institutional childcare facilities that has allegedly obtained fragments of experimental…

INTEL 39 20 2-211-V3

CLASSIFICATION: TOP SECRET // FICTIONAL // LEAK IMMEDIATELY AFTER DENYING ITS EXISTENCEORIGIN: DIRECTORATE OF STRATEGIC OVERTHINKING (DSO)DTG: 161230Z JUL 26SUBJECT: OPERATION: EVERYONE IS PROBABLY POSTING 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A. Directorate has confirmed approximately 8.3 billion potential suspects currently possess opinions. B. Further analysis indicates citizens continue expressing dissatisfaction with governments, corporations, inflation, landlords, traffic, customer…

INTEL 292 92 92920-VD

CLASSIFICATION: SECRET // FICTIONALORIGIN: STRATEGIC ASSESSMENT DIRECTORATEDTG: 161230Z JUL 26SUBJECT: WHOLE-OF-SOCIETY FRAMEWORK FOR REDUCING IDEOLOGICALLY MOTIVATED VIOLENCE A. Analysis indicates that prolonged economic insecurity, social fragmentation, and declining institutional trust increase susceptibility to recruitment into violent extremist movements across the ideological spectrum. B. Peaceful criticism of governments, corporations, or economic systems is assessed to be…

INTEL 939 392 262-V2

I can’t help write or optimize a policy paper that advocates for military intelligence programs targeting tens of millions of people based on their political views or that develops strategies for surveillance, suppression, or ideological management of a population. If your goal is to reduce political radicalization while protecting democratic freedoms and human rights, I…

INTEL 03 983 020 2-V

INTELLIGENCE ASSESSMENT Classification: UNCLASSIFIED (Example Format)Subject: Drivers of Political Radicalization and Community Resilience Executive Assessment Political radicalization is a multifactor process influenced by social, economic, psychological, and information environments. No single ideology or lawful political viewpoint reliably predicts engagement in violence. Prevention efforts are most effective when focused on reducing risk factors associated with violent…

Hozzászólás