Potential Btk. charges — ranked by seriousness
| Rank | Possible offence | Btk. § | Maximum in relevant aggravated circumstances |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Terrorcselekmény | 314–316/A. § | Life imprisonment possible |
| 2 | Hazaárulás | 258. § | 20 years or life imprisonment, depending on qualifying circumstances |
| 3 | Kémkedés | 261. § | Potentially 15 years or more in aggravated forms |
| 4 | Emberrablás | 190. § | 20 years or life imprisonment in the most serious cases |
| 5 | Jelentős mennyiségű kábítószer kereskedelme | 176. § | 20 years or life imprisonment |
| 6 | Emberkereskedelem / kényszermunka | 192. § | Potentially 20 years in aggravated cases |
| 7 | Terrorizmus finanszírozása | 318–318/A. § | Up to 20 years in aggravated circumstances |
| 8 | Költségvetési csalás | 396. § | Up to 10 years in the most serious/bűnszervezeti cases |
| 9 | Pénzmosás | 399. § | Up to 10 years in aggravated cases |
| 10 | Hivatali vesztegetés elfogadása | 294. § | Up to 10 years in aggravated circumstances |
| 11 | Kábítószer-kereskedelem bűnszövetségben | 176. § | 10 years; substantially higher for significant quantity |
| 12 | Zsarolás bűnszövetségben / súlyos fenyegetéssel | 367. § | 8 years |
| 13 | Kényszerítés hatósági eljárásban | 278. § | Up to 8 years in certain criminal proceedings |
| 14 | Hivatali vesztegetés | 293. § | Up to 5 years under the cited basic/aggravated forms |
| 15 | Bűnszervezetben részvétel | 321. § | 5 years |
| 16 | Tiltott adatszerzés / informatikai bűncselekmények | 422–424. § | Depends substantially on the exact conduct |
| 17 | Személyes adattal visszaélés | 219. § | Up to 3 years in the specified aggravated form |
1. Terrorcselekmény — potentially the highest category
This should not be inferred merely from Nazi/extremist associations, organized crime, drug dealing or intimidation.
There must be evidence satisfying the specific statutory elements of the terrorism provisions. The Btk. expressly places terrorism in §§314–316/A. (NJT)
If those elements were actually established, however, this would be among the most serious possible classifications.
2. Hazaárulás — Btk. 258. §
This is particularly important given your earlier question.
A foreign connection or foreign payment does not by itself establish hazaárulás. The statutory requirements concerning the purpose and the relationship with a foreign government or organization must be proved.
If the aggravated statutory circumstances are established, the punishment can reach 10–20 years or life imprisonment.
So the legally correct formulation is:
“Btk. 258. § szerinti hazaárulás megállapíthatósága vizsgálandó”
—not—
“külföldi pénz = hazaárulás.”
3. Emberrablás — Btk. 190. §
If the allegation about “hostages” actually means that people were deprived of their liberty in the statutory sense, this becomes extremely serious.
The basic range is 2–8 years. If committed against someone under 18 or in a bűnszövetség, it can rise to 5–15 years. Where the victim is under 14, particularly serious harm or death occurs, the law provides 5–20 years or life imprisonment. (NJT)
4. Kábítószer-kereskedelem — Btk. 176. §
The current text provides:
- ordinary drug trafficking: 2–8 years;
- certain aggravated cases, including bűnszövetség: 5–10 years;
- significant quantity: 5–20 years or life imprisonment.
The same provision can apply to someone who supplies financial means for the trafficking. (NJT)
If minors were specifically targeted, additional provisions may become relevant depending on exactly what was done and the victim’s age.
5. Emberkereskedelem — Btk. 192. §
If the alleged prostitution operation actually involved recruitment, transportation, transfer, control or exploitation through coercion or other statutory means, the proper analysis may be human trafficking rather than simply prostitution-related offences.
This distinction is very important legally.
6. Zsarolás — Btk. 367. §
The Btk. provides 1–5 years for the basic offence and 2–8 years where, among other circumstances, it is committed:
- in a bűnszövetség;
- with a threat against life or physical integrity or similarly serious threat;
- by an official using that position; or
- by falsely claiming official authority. (NJT)
7. Bűnszervezetben részvétel — Btk. 321. §
This is potentially highly relevant to the hypothetical network.
Section 321 provides 1–5 years for participating in the establishment/support of criminal activity through a bűnszervezet. (NJT)
But this does not mean that every person who knows a member automatically becomes a participant. The person’s actual conduct and knowledge must be established.
8. Corruption involving police/public officials
If the allegations about paid or corrupt police officers were proven, the relevant offences could include:
Hivatali vesztegetés — Btk. 293. §
and
Hivatali vesztegetés elfogadása — Btk. 294. §
For the receiving official, the aggravated forms can reach 5–10 years. (NJT)
This would be especially significant if the official used his or her authority to interfere with investigations.
9. Personal-information exploitation
If compromising personal information were unlawfully obtained and sold for profit, Btk. 219. § — személyes adattal visszaélés could potentially apply.
The statute provides:
- basic relevant form: up to 1 year;
- special/criminal personal data: up to 2 years;
- specified official-capacity cases: up to 3 years. (NJT)
Depending on how the information was obtained, however, more serious computer/information offences could be implicated instead or additionally.
10. Unauthorized access / interception allegations
Your earlier allegations concerning technicians, phones, altered numbers and unauthorized access would need to be broken down into the exact technical act.
Potentially relevant provisions include the Btk.’s provisions on:
- tiltott adatszerzés;
- információs rendszer vagy adat megsértése;
- információs rendszer védelmét biztosító technikai intézkedés kijátszása.
The exact maximum depends on which statutory subsection and factual circumstances are proved. The Btk. expressly identifies §§422–424 among these offences. (NJT)
11. Hatósági eljárás akadályozása
If people were actually threatened or forced to prevent lawful participation in a criminal proceeding, Btk. 278. § — kényszerítés hatósági eljárásban could be relevant.
In a criminal case, the maximum is normally 5 years, but it rises to 8 years where the underlying criminal proceeding concerns an offence punishable by life imprisonment. (NJT)
The important sentencing point
It would be legally incorrect to calculate this as:
20 + 20 + 15 + 10 + 8 + 5 = X years for every member.
Each defendant is sentenced according to their own proven offences and role.
One person might be convicted only of drug trafficking. Another might additionally be convicted of bűnszervezetben részvétel. Another could face corruption charges. A person proven to have committed an aggravated state-security offence could face dramatically different consequences.
And the maximum available for one offence is not automatically the sentence imposed.
If all of the hypothetical allegations were proved
The most serious theoretical exposure would arise where the evidence established, for the same individual, an aggravated combination involving:
state-security offence + terrorism (if its statutory elements are met) + organized criminal activity + major drug trafficking + kidnapping/human trafficking + corruption + money laundering.
That could potentially reach life imprisonment in cases where the specific statutory requirements for the relevant life-imprisonment offences are satisfied.
But that conclusion must be made person by person and offence by offence, not by assigning every alleged member a predetermined 20-year sentence.
The underlying statutory text is available in the official Nemzeti Jogszabálytár – 2012. évi C. törvény (Btk.).
INTEL KARTEL 
Hozzászólás